Sig is a New Hampshire based company that manufactures firearms and supportive equipment. One of their handguns, the P320 has been shown to discharge without the trigger being pulled.
Here is a comment I made to a video on YouTube
Wouldn't it be logical to ask, what is different about the P320 compared to, say the 365 which does not discharge on its own? How can Sig not know the answer to that question? This appears to be ignorant negligence. Sig chose to have all P320 owners wondering if their gun is defective, therefore dangerous. I own a P320 and I had an issue which I'm not positive about. I was target shooting and during rapid fire I think a round discharged before being completely chambered. I contacted Sig and they have not responded. Sig needs to make this right by, buying back all the P320's or recalling and fixing all the 320's. I don't think all P320 owners would want their P320 replaced because they have not had any issues with the gun.
I think Sig should offer a buy back thereby restoring their reputation as a reputable company. Many P320 owners would not want to give up their P320, because they are problem free. The issue is not with all P320's.
DT
This interview did not resolve the "P320" issue. There is too much logic that supports the fact that the P320 has a real problem. Why is Sig the only gun manufacturer that has this issue? There are videos that show the P320 is discharging without the trigger being pulled.. Shouldn't Sig have compared the defective P320's with P320's that did not have the discharge issue? Find out what is different about the P320's that have discharged without a trigger pull. Sig Sauer has improperly handled this issue from the very beginning. They should have recalled the P320's that had the discharge problem and compared them to P320's that did not have the discharge problem. Finding that issue and asking for a voluntary would have saved Sig's reputation.
No comments:
Post a Comment